QUALITY

Reliability Code

TRANSPATH presents more than an extraction of data from the published literature. It also includes a quality evaluation and a reliability code.

The reliability of experimental evidence in the sense of biological relevance is defined by the source of the biological material and the method used for indication ( Material and methods   Table 1).
Our annotators evaluate the quality of experimental data from primary literature. The reliability code given in the quality matrix ( Quality matrix   Table 2) is a combination from a list of methods and a category of the biological material.

Biological material can be extracted from a complete organism, for example a knock-out mutant, or recombinant polypeptides. Thus, reactions obtained from experiments with different biological materials have different probabilities for existing in vivo. We provide a reliability value that is defined by each possible combination of category and method on a scale of 1 to 5 (highest to lowest reliability, Values   Table 3). The value is attached to mechanistic reactions.
The annotators use only data from peer-reviewed publications. If controls are missing or are not credible in a specific paper, the data will not be included.

Table 1: Methods and biological material: abbreviations and classification
  Material   Method Description/Examples
A1 Wild-type M1 Yeast two-hybrid system  
A2 Natural chromosomal mutants leading to new phenotype M2 Screening of expression libraries with other (labeled) proteins E.g. phage display, eukaryotic cDNA library with EXIox vectors
A3 Knock-out M3 (Co-) localization of proteins in cells and tissues by microscopical analysis E.g. immunofluorescence, in situ detection, electron microscopy
A4 Transgenic animals M4 Affinity precipitation in solution/batch (e.g. with sepharose or magneto beads) E.g. immunoprecipitation, pull-down assay
A5 Induced, but not defined mutations M5 In vitro protein-protein binding assay (solid phase) E.g. ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay)
B1 Embryonic cells M6 Surface plasmon resonance Detection and quantification of ligands
B2 Stem cells -> pluripotent M7 Far Western or Gel overlay or protein-lipid overlay assay Gel overlay: detection of binding partners on blotted proteins after transfer from a gel
B3 Primary cells M8 Affinity chromatography with matrices Proteins coupled to e.g. sepharose or agarose matrices
B4 Recombinant cells/tissue/organisms (transfected); not permanent cell lines M9 Peptide spot Search for binding partners of defined peptide motifs on a membrane
C1 Permanent tissue culture cells M10 Crosslinking Detection by SDS-Page and Western blot
D1 Permanent or transient transfected or infected cells (tissue culture cells) M11 EMSA (electrophoretic mobility shift assay)  
D2 Recombinant proteins produced e.g. from Baculo virus vectors in insect cells, transfected/microinjected Xenopus oocytes M12 Binding assay Binding of labeled ligand to receptor-expressing cells, quantitative evaluation, for example Scatchard analysis
E1 Recombinant proteins from Yeast M13 Modification of proteins in living cells E.g. proteinphosphorylation and -dephosphorylation, ubiquitination, farnesylation; detection of the modified proteins, e.g. from cell extracts
F1 Recombinant proteins from e.g. E.coli, Bacillus subtilis M14 Subcellular extraction of proteins Fractionation for localization of proteins
F2 In vitro translation, synthetic peptides M15 Dot spots Spotted proteins detected with specific antibodies
M16 In vitro modification of a substrate E.g. phosphorylation or dephosphorylation (e.g. Kinase-assay), ubiquitination
M17 Reporter gene assay E.g. luciferase assay, beta-galactosidase
M18 Western blot, SDS page  
M19 mRNA detection by Northern blot Indirect evidence for protein interaction
M20 Localization of mRNA in tissues by e.g. FISH, ISH (p32, H3) Indirect evidence for protein interaction
M21 Detection of mRNA by RT-PCR Reverse transcriptase, thereafter PCR; quantitative mRNA detection; indirect evidence for protein interaction
M22 Mammalian two (or tri) -hybrid assay  
M23 Co-sedimentation and -purification by chemico-physical methods Biochemical purification of stable complexes by e.g analytical ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)
M24 Protein cleavage and specific degradation Documented by protein detection of e.g. S35-labeled or biotinylated protein fragments, immunoblots, SDS-PAGE only, HPLC, mass spectral analysis
M25 Interaction measurement by chemico-physical methods E.g. crystal structure analysis of complexes; spectrofluorometer FRET: fluorescence resonance energy transfer; intensity and/or wavelength of fluorescence of a given interacting compound changes, when another molecule binds to it; quantitative; usually done in vitro; also NMR: looking at changes in nuclear spin, usually done with peptide fragments and in unphysiological solutions, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)
M26 mRNA expression profile analysis E.g. microarray data
M27 Transmembrane potential measurements E.g. current-voltage experiments
M28 Predicted by binding-site sequence  
M29 Co-localization  
M30 In vitro binding  
M31 In vitro reconstitution of activity  
M32 Flow cytometry  
M33 Ligand binding  
M34 Two-hybrid Cell system not specified

back to the top   next

Table 2: Quality matrix
  A1-5 B1-3 B4 C1 D1 D2 E1 F1-2
M1 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 6
M2 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5
M3 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 6
M4 1 2 2 2 2 3 4 5
M5 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 5
M6 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4
M7 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5
M8 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5
M9 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
M10 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 5
M11 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
M12 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4
M13 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 5
M14 3 3 3 3 3 4 5 5
M15 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 5
M16 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5
M17 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 4
M18 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
M19 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5
M20 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
M21 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6
M22 6 6 6 6 1 6 6 6
M23 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5
M24 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5
M25 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 5
M26 4 4 4 4 5 6 6 6
M27 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
M28* 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
M29* 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
M30* 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
M31* 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
M32* 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
M33* 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
M34* 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
*Methods were added in the course of integration of reactions from Proteome BKL. Quality values have not yet been assigned, because the integrated reactions lack the material information yet.

back to the top   next

Table 3: Quality scale: reliability value
priorities reliability
1 highest reliability
2 high reliability
3 moderate (average) reliability
4 modest reliability
5 low reliability
6 value not assigned

back to annotate   back to reaction